Plantain Chips Naturally Sweet vs Crossies Backerbsen
Overall, Crossies Backerbsen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Plantain Chips Naturally Swe... | Crossies Backerbsen |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 496 kcal | 521 kcal |
| Fat | 25.1 g | 30 g |
| Saturated fat | 10.1 g | 2.7 g |
| Sugars | 22.2 g | 1 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 2.5 g |
| Fiber | 3.8 g | 4 g |
| Protein | 2.5 g | 7.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Plantain Chips Naturally Sweet has 16% less fat (25.1 g vs 30 g).
- Crossies Backerbsen has 73% less saturated fat (2.7 g vs 10.1 g).
- Crossies Backerbsen has 95% less sugar (1 g vs 22.2 g).
- Plantain Chips Naturally Sweet has no salt, while Crossies Backerbsen has 2.5 g.
- Crossies Backerbsen has 67% more protein (7.5 g vs 2.5 g).
- Only Crossies Backerbsen lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Plantain Chips Naturally Sweet
Banane Plantain 70%, Huile Végétale Non Hydrogénée Oléine De Palme.
Crossies Backerbsen
Getreidemahlerzeugnisse (WEIZENMEHL, WEIZENVOLLKORNMEHL, Maismehl"), Sonnenblumenöl", Natur-Steinsalz, Muskat", Backpulver (Maisstärke", Säuerungsmittel: Kaliumtartrate aus Traubensaft", Backtriebmittel: Natriumhydrogencarbonat)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Plantain Chips Naturally Sweet or Crossies Backerbsen?
Overall, Crossies Backerbsen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Plantain Chips Naturally Sweet has fewer calories: 496 kcal versus 521 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Crossies Backerbsen has less sugar: 1 g versus 22.2 g per 100 g.