Comparison

Plant based vs ProActiv Original

Overall, ProActiv Original has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPlant basedProActiv Original
Nutri-Score d c
NOVA group 2 4
Calories 683 kcal 315 kcal
Fat 75 g 35 g
Saturated fat 19 g 7.6 g
Sugars 0.8 g 0.5 g
Salt 1.2 g 0.3 g
Fiber 0.3 g —
Protein 0.2 g 0.1 g
Additives02
AllergensGlutenNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • ProActiv Original has 54% fewer calories (315 kcal vs 683 kcal).
  • ProActiv Original has 53% less fat (35 g vs 75 g).
  • ProActiv Original has 60% less saturated fat (7.6 g vs 19 g).
  • ProActiv Original has 38% less sugar (0.5 g vs 0.8 g).
  • ProActiv Original has 75% less salt (0.3 g vs 1.2 g).
  • ProActiv Original has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Plant based is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Plant based lists: Gluten.

Ingredients

Plant based

plant oils (rapeseed, coconut, shea), water, oat, culture, salt, carrot concentrate, lemon concentrate

ProActiv Original

Agua, aceites vegetales (nabina,girasol, linaza), ésteres de esteroles vegetales (9%) equivalen a esteroles vegetales (5,4%)), grasa de coco, sal (0,3%), emulgente (lecitina), aromas naturales, vitaminas (A, D).

FAQ

Which is healthier: Plant based or ProActiv Original?

Overall, ProActiv Original has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

ProActiv Original has fewer calories: 315 kcal versus 683 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

ProActiv Original has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons