Pipas Tijuana vs Pipas gigantes aguasal
Overall, Pipas Tijuana has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 4.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pipas Tijuana | Pipas gigantes aguasal |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | b |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 263 kcal | 618 kcal |
| Fat | 22 g | 52 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.4 g | 6.6 g |
| Sugars | 0.8 g | 3.5 g |
| Salt | 2.7 g | 0.3 g |
| Fiber | 3.8 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 13 g | 31 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pipas Tijuana has 57% fewer calories (263 kcal vs 618 kcal).
- Pipas Tijuana has 58% less fat (22 g vs 52 g).
- Pipas Tijuana has 64% less saturated fat (2.4 g vs 6.6 g).
- Pipas Tijuana has 77% less sugar (0.8 g vs 3.5 g).
- Pipas gigantes aguasal has 91% less salt (0.3 g vs 2.7 g).
- Pipas Tijuana has 100% more fiber (3.8 g vs 0 g).
- Pipas gigantes aguasal has 58% more protein (31 g vs 13 g).
- Pipas gigantes aguasal has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Pipas Tijuana
Not available.
Pipas gigantes aguasal
pipas de girasol y sal (6%),
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pipas Tijuana or Pipas gigantes aguasal?
Overall, Pipas Tijuana has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pipas Tijuana has fewer calories: 263 kcal versus 618 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pipas Tijuana has less sugar: 0.8 g versus 3.5 g per 100 g.