Piríttott napraforgómag vs Pipas gigantes aguasal
Overall, Piríttott napraforgómag has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Piríttott napraforgómag | Pipas gigantes aguasal |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | 1 | 3 |
| Calories | 321 kcal | 618 kcal |
| Fat | 28 g | 52 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.2 g | 6.6 g |
| Sugars | 1.6 g | 3.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.3 g |
| Fiber | 6.4 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 11 g | 31 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Piríttott napraforgómag has 48% fewer calories (321 kcal vs 618 kcal).
- Piríttott napraforgómag has 46% less fat (28 g vs 52 g).
- Piríttott napraforgómag has 52% less saturated fat (3.2 g vs 6.6 g).
- Piríttott napraforgómag has 54% less sugar (1.6 g vs 3.5 g).
- Piríttott napraforgómag has 100% more fiber (6.4 g vs 0 g).
- Pipas gigantes aguasal has 65% more protein (31 g vs 11 g).
- Piríttott napraforgómag has the better Nutri-Score.
- Piríttott napraforgómag is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Piríttott napraforgómag
pirított napraforgómag
Pipas gigantes aguasal
pipas de girasol y sal (6%),
FAQ
Which is healthier: Piríttott napraforgómag or Pipas gigantes aguasal?
Overall, Piríttott napraforgómag has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Piríttott napraforgómag has fewer calories: 321 kcal versus 618 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Piríttott napraforgómag has less sugar: 1.6 g versus 3.5 g per 100 g.