Pinsa vs Pinsa romana
Overall, Pinsa romana has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pinsa | Pinsa romana |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | a |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 263 kcal | 239 kcal |
| Fat | 4.8 g | 5.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.9 g | 0.6 g |
| Sugars | 3.1 g | 0.4 g |
| Salt | 1.8 g | 1 g |
| Fiber | 3.3 g | 8.5 g |
| Protein | 9.4 g | 9.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pinsa romana has 33% less saturated fat (0.6 g vs 0.9 g).
- Pinsa romana has 87% less sugar (0.4 g vs 3.1 g).
- Pinsa romana has 42% less salt (1 g vs 1.8 g).
- Pinsa romana has 61% more fiber (8.5 g vs 3.3 g).
- Pinsa romana has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Pinsa romana lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Pinsa
Not available.
Pinsa romana
Farina di frumento 0, acqua, pasta soda di frumento (15%), olio extravergine di of va farina di riso, farina integrale di segale Tipo 21 semi di lino, semi di girasole, semi di zucca, farina di orso, farina di avena, farina di malto
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pinsa or Pinsa romana?
Overall, Pinsa romana has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pinsa romana has fewer calories: 239 kcal versus 263 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pinsa romana has less sugar: 0.4 g versus 3.1 g per 100 g.