Petit nesquik vs Crème au Chocolat
Overall, Crème au Chocolat has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Petit nesquik | Crème au Chocolat |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 160 kcal | 149 kcal |
| Fat | 6.1 g | 5.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 4 g | 3.6 g |
| Sugars | 17.8 g | 14.2 g |
| Salt | 0.5 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | 2.3 g |
| Protein | 4.2 g | 3.6 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Crème au Chocolat has 13% less fat (5.3 g vs 6.1 g).
- Crème au Chocolat has 20% less sugar (14.2 g vs 17.8 g).
- Crème au Chocolat has 79% less salt (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
- Crème au Chocolat has 78% more fiber (2.3 g vs 0.5 g).
- Petit nesquik has 14% more protein (4.2 g vs 3.6 g).
- Crème au Chocolat is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Petit nesquik
Lait entier (69,4%), sucre, crème (lait) (CH: double-crème) (7,5%), poudre de lait écrémé, amidon modifié, cacao maigre en poudre (1,5%), correcteur d'acidité (citrates de sodium), amidon, concentré de minéraux du lait, cannelle, vitamine D. 'Lait origine France.
Crème au Chocolat
lait entier* 75,8%, sucre de canne non raffiné*, chocolat en poudre* 6% (sucre de canne non raffiné*, cacao poudre*), crème entière* 5%, cacao en poudre, amidon de tapioca*. Traces éventuelles de fruits à coque. *Issus de l'agriculture biologique.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Petit nesquik or Crème au Chocolat?
Overall, Crème au Chocolat has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Crème au Chocolat has fewer calories: 149 kcal versus 160 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Crème au Chocolat has less sugar: 14.2 g versus 17.8 g per 100 g.