Comparison

Petit nesquik vs Le Fondant Chocolat

Overall, Le Fondant Chocolat has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPetit nesquikLe Fondant Chocolat
Nutri-Score d c
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 160 kcal 151 kcal
Fat 6.1 g 8.2 g
Saturated fat 4 g 5.7 g
Sugars 17.8 g 14.9 g
Salt 0.5 g 0.1 g
Fiber 0.5 g 1.1 g
Protein 4.2 g 3.6 g
Additives24
AllergensMilkMilk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Petit nesquik has 26% less fat (6.1 g vs 8.2 g).
  • Petit nesquik has 30% less saturated fat (4 g vs 5.7 g).
  • Le Fondant Chocolat has 16% less sugar (14.9 g vs 17.8 g).
  • Le Fondant Chocolat has 79% less salt (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Le Fondant Chocolat has 55% more fiber (1.1 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Petit nesquik has 14% more protein (4.2 g vs 3.6 g).
  • Le Fondant Chocolat has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Petit nesquik

Lait entier (69,4%), sucre, crème (lait) (CH: double-crème) (7,5%), poudre de lait écrémé, amidon modifié, cacao maigre en poudre (1,5%), correcteur d'acidité (citrates de sodium), amidon, concentré de minéraux du lait, cannelle, vitamine D. 'Lait origine France.

Le Fondant Chocolat

Lait entier, crème, sucre, chocolat 8% (pâte de cacao, sucre, poudre de cacao maigre, beurre de cacao, émulsifiant : lécithine), protéines de lait, gélifiants: carraghénanes (extrait d'algues) - gomme xanthane. Peut contenir des fruits à coque.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Petit nesquik or Le Fondant Chocolat?

Overall, Le Fondant Chocolat has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Le Fondant Chocolat has fewer calories: 151 kcal versus 160 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Le Fondant Chocolat has less sugar: 14.9 g versus 17.8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons