Perlembourg Panaché vs Radler
Overall, Radler has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Perlembourg Panaché | Radler |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 21 kcal | 21 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 4.5 g | 1.4 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | — |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 2 | 3 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Radler has no fat, while Perlembourg Panaché has 0.5 g.
- Radler has 69% less sugar (1.4 g vs 4.5 g).
Ingredients
Perlembourg Panaché
PANACHE. Ingrédients; eau gazéifiée, bière (eau, malt d'orge mais, extraits de houblon), sucre, arôme naturel d'agrumes avec autres arômes naturels, acidifiant: acide citrique, antioxydant: acide ascorbique, extrait de malt.
Radler
Piwo (woda, słód jęczmienny, jęczmień browarny, chmiel, ekstrakt chmielu), lemoniada o smaku cytrynowym (woda, sok cytrynowy z zagęszczonego soku 3 %, ekstrakt cytrynowy, koncentrat pomarańczy, cukier, aromaty, stabilizator - mączka chleba świętojańskiego; regulator kwasowości - kwas cytrynowy; dwutlenek węgla); substancja słodząca: acesulfam K.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Perlembourg Panaché or Radler?
Overall, Radler has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Perlembourg Panaché has fewer calories: 21 kcal versus 21 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Radler has less sugar: 1.4 g versus 4.5 g per 100 g.