Radler Natur Trüb vs Radler
Overall, Radler has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Radler Natur Trüb | Radler |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 38 kcal | 21 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 1.4 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 4 | 3 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Gerstenmalz, Gerstenmalzextrakt | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Radler has 45% fewer calories (21 kcal vs 38 kcal).
- Radler Natur Trüb has no sugar, while Radler has 1.4 g.
- Radler has 100% more protein (0.5 g vs 0 g).
- Only Radler Natur Trüb lists: Gerstenmalz, Gerstenmalzextrakt.
Ingredients
Radler Natur Trüb
Wasser, Bier (Wasser, _Gerstenmalz_, Hopfenextrakt), Zucker, Kohlensäure, Zitronensaftkonzentrat, Säuerungsmittel: Citronensäure, Zitronenextrakt, Stabilisatoren E414 und E410; natürliches Citrusaroma, _Gerstenmalzextrakt_
Radler
Piwo (woda, słód jęczmienny, jęczmień browarny, chmiel, ekstrakt chmielu), lemoniada o smaku cytrynowym (woda, sok cytrynowy z zagęszczonego soku 3 %, ekstrakt cytrynowy, koncentrat pomarańczy, cukier, aromaty, stabilizator - mączka chleba świętojańskiego; regulator kwasowości - kwas cytrynowy; dwutlenek węgla); substancja słodząca: acesulfam K.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Radler Natur Trüb or Radler?
Overall, Radler has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Radler has fewer calories: 21 kcal versus 38 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Radler Natur Trüb has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.4 g per 100 g.