Panache vs Radler
Overall, Radler has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Panache | Radler |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 28 kcal | 21 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 6.3 g | 1.4 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 3 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Radler has 25% fewer calories (21 kcal vs 28 kcal).
- Radler has no fat, while Panache has 0.5 g.
- Radler has 78% less sugar (1.4 g vs 6.3 g).
- Only Radler lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Panache
Not available.
Radler
Piwo (woda, słód jęczmienny, jęczmień browarny, chmiel, ekstrakt chmielu), lemoniada o smaku cytrynowym (woda, sok cytrynowy z zagęszczonego soku 3 %, ekstrakt cytrynowy, koncentrat pomarańczy, cukier, aromaty, stabilizator - mączka chleba świętojańskiego; regulator kwasowości - kwas cytrynowy; dwutlenek węgla); substancja słodząca: acesulfam K.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Panache or Radler?
Overall, Radler has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Radler has fewer calories: 21 kcal versus 28 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Radler has less sugar: 1.4 g versus 6.3 g per 100 g.