Pavés de bœuf marinés aux 3 poivres vs Köttbular
Overall, Pavés de bœuf marinés aux 3 poivres has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pavés de bœuf marinés aux 3... | Köttbular |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | c |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 115 kcal | 206 kcal |
| Fat | 3.1 g | 12 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.9 g | 1.8 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.9 g |
| Salt | 0.4 g | 1.5 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | 0.7 g |
| Protein | 21 g | 15 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Eggs, Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pavés de bœuf marinés aux 3 poivres has 44% fewer calories (115 kcal vs 206 kcal).
- Pavés de bœuf marinés aux 3 poivres has 74% less fat (3.1 g vs 12 g).
- Pavés de bœuf marinés aux 3 poivres has 50% less saturated fat (0.9 g vs 1.8 g).
- Pavés de bœuf marinés aux 3 poivres has 44% less sugar (0.5 g vs 0.9 g).
- Pavés de bœuf marinés aux 3 poivres has 71% less salt (0.4 g vs 1.5 g).
- Pavés de bœuf marinés aux 3 poivres has 29% more protein (21 g vs 15 g).
- Pavés de bœuf marinés aux 3 poivres has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Köttbular lists: Eggs, Gluten.
Ingredients
Pavés de bœuf marinés aux 3 poivres
Not available.
Köttbular
Hähnchenfleisch z.T. fein zerkleinert (75%), Zwiebeln, _Eier_, Paniermehl (_Weizenmehl_, Salz), Kartoffelmehl, Speisesalz, Wasser, Gewürze.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pavés de bœuf marinés aux 3 poivres or Köttbular?
Overall, Pavés de bœuf marinés aux 3 poivres has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pavés de bœuf marinés aux 3 poivres has fewer calories: 115 kcal versus 206 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pavés de bœuf marinés aux 3 poivres has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.9 g per 100 g.