Pâtes fraiches farcies aux tomates confites et romarin vs Rotolini ricotta e spinaci
Overall, Rotolini ricotta e spinaci has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.
Pâtes fraiches farcies aux tomates confites et romarin
Rotolini ricotta e spinaci
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pâtes fraiches farcies aux t... | Rotolini ricotta e spinaci |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 244 kcal | 148 kcal |
| Fat | 7.4 g | 6.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.6 g | 4.4 g |
| Sugars | 3.4 g | 3.2 g |
| Salt | 1.3 g | 0.7 g |
| Fiber | 2.7 g | — |
| Protein | 9 g | 5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Eggs, Gluten, Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Rotolini ricotta e spinaci has 39% fewer calories (148 kcal vs 244 kcal).
- Rotolini ricotta e spinaci has 14% less fat (6.4 g vs 7.4 g).
- Pâtes fraiches farcies aux tomates confites et romarin has 41% less saturated fat (2.6 g vs 4.4 g).
- Rotolini ricotta e spinaci has 49% less salt (0.7 g vs 1.3 g).
- Pâtes fraiches farcies aux tomates confites et romarin has 44% more protein (9 g vs 5 g).
- Rotolini ricotta e spinaci has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Pâtes fraiches farcies aux tomates confites et romarin lists: Eggs, Gluten, Milk.
Ingredients
Pâtes fraiches farcies aux tomates confites et romarin
Pate 50%: Semoule de BLE dur de qualité supérieure*, eau, OEUFS* 5%. Farce 50% : tomates mi-séchées* 16%, chapelure* (farine de BLÉ*, sel), FROMAGE frais*, EMMENTAL*, RICOTTA*, huile de tournesol*, flocon de pommes de terre déshydratées*, fibre de son de BLE*, sel, fibre de psyllium*, romarin*, sucre*,poivre*. Pourcentages exprimés sur l'ensemble du produit. * Ingrédients d'origine agricole issus de l'agriculture biologique.
Rotolini ricotta e spinaci
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pâtes fraiches farcies aux tomates confites et romarin or Rotolini ricotta e spinaci?
Overall, Rotolini ricotta e spinaci has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Rotolini ricotta e spinaci has fewer calories: 148 kcal versus 244 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Rotolini ricotta e spinaci has less sugar: 3.2 g versus 3.4 g per 100 g.