Paté de Lapin à l’ancienne vs Pate de lapin
Overall, Pate de lapin has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Paté de Lapin à l’ancienne | Pate de lapin |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 312 kcal | 292 kcal |
| Fat | 26.7 g | 24 g |
| Saturated fat | 10.2 g | 8.6 g |
| Sugars | 1.2 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 1.6 g | 1.5 g |
| Protein | 15 g | 18 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | Eggs | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pate de lapin has 10% less fat (24 g vs 26.7 g).
- Pate de lapin has 16% less saturated fat (8.6 g vs 10.2 g).
- Pate de lapin has 58% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1.2 g).
- Pate de lapin has 17% more protein (18 g vs 15 g).
- Pate de lapin has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Paté de Lapin à l’ancienne lists: Eggs.
Ingredients
Paté de Lapin à l’ancienne
Viande et gras de porc (France) Viande et foie de Lapin français 33%, épices et plantes aromatiques, blanc, blanc d OEUF, amidon, sel marin, sirop de glucose, antioxydant [301 colorant de surface: E150a
Pate de lapin
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Paté de Lapin à l’ancienne or Pate de lapin?
Overall, Pate de lapin has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pate de lapin has fewer calories: 292 kcal versus 312 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pate de lapin has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1.2 g per 100 g.