Paté de Lapin à l’ancienne vs Pate de lapin
Overall, Pate de lapin has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Paté de Lapin à l’ancienne | Pate de lapin |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 312 kcal | 377 kcal |
| Fat | 26.7 g | 34 g |
| Saturated fat | 10.2 g | 14 g |
| Sugars | 1.2 g | 0.6 g |
| Salt | 1.6 g | 1 g |
| Protein | 15 g | 15 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | Eggs | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Paté de Lapin à l’ancienne has 17% fewer calories (312 kcal vs 377 kcal).
- Paté de Lapin à l’ancienne has 21% less fat (26.7 g vs 34 g).
- Paté de Lapin à l’ancienne has 27% less saturated fat (10.2 g vs 14 g).
- Pate de lapin has 50% less sugar (0.6 g vs 1.2 g).
- Pate de lapin has 38% less salt (1 g vs 1.6 g).
- Pate de lapin has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Paté de Lapin à l’ancienne lists: Eggs.
Ingredients
Paté de Lapin à l’ancienne
Viande et gras de porc (France) Viande et foie de Lapin français 33%, épices et plantes aromatiques, blanc, blanc d OEUF, amidon, sel marin, sirop de glucose, antioxydant [301 colorant de surface: E150a
Pate de lapin
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Paté de Lapin à l’ancienne or Pate de lapin?
Overall, Pate de lapin has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Paté de Lapin à l’ancienne has fewer calories: 312 kcal versus 377 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pate de lapin has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 1.2 g per 100 g.