Comparison

Paté de hígado de pato vs Chistorra

Overall, Paté de hígado de pato has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPaté de hígado de patoChistorra
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group — 4
Calories 329 kcal 485 kcal
Fat 31 g 46.2 g
Saturated fat 12.4 g 19.4 g
Sugars 1.7 g 1.4 g
Salt 1.4 g 2.5 g
Protein 10 g 15.6 g
Additives05
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Paté de hígado de pato has 32% fewer calories (329 kcal vs 485 kcal).
  • Paté de hígado de pato has 33% less fat (31 g vs 46.2 g).
  • Paté de hígado de pato has 36% less saturated fat (12.4 g vs 19.4 g).
  • Chistorra has 18% less sugar (1.4 g vs 1.7 g).
  • Paté de hígado de pato has 44% less salt (1.4 g vs 2.5 g).
  • Chistorra has 36% more protein (15.6 g vs 10 g).

Ingredients

Paté de hígado de pato

Not available.

Chistorra

Carne y grasa de cerdo (95%), sal, pimentón, ajo, antioxidante (E301), conservadores (E250, E252). Envoltura comestible (colágeno de vacuno, agua, estabilizantes (E422, E460), aceite de colza).

FAQ

Which is healthier: Paté de hígado de pato or Chistorra?

Overall, Paté de hígado de pato has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Paté de hígado de pato has fewer calories: 329 kcal versus 485 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Chistorra has less sugar: 1.4 g versus 1.7 g per 100 g.

More comparisons