Pate aucanard vs Mousse de pato
Overall, Pate aucanard has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pate aucanard | Mousse de pato |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 298 kcal | 482 kcal |
| Fat | 25 g | 47 g |
| Saturated fat | 9 g | 16 g |
| Sugars | 0.7 g | 1.7 g |
| Salt | 1.4 g | 2 g |
| Fiber | 0.4 g | — |
| Protein | 15 g | 9.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 5 |
| Allergens | None listed | Eggs, Milk, Mustard |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pate aucanard has 38% fewer calories (298 kcal vs 482 kcal).
- Pate aucanard has 47% less fat (25 g vs 47 g).
- Pate aucanard has 44% less saturated fat (9 g vs 16 g).
- Pate aucanard has 59% less sugar (0.7 g vs 1.7 g).
- Pate aucanard has 30% less salt (1.4 g vs 2 g).
- Pate aucanard has 34% more protein (15 g vs 9.9 g).
- Pate aucanard has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Mousse de pato lists: Eggs, Milk, Mustard.
Ingredients
Pate aucanard
Not available.
Mousse de pato
92% Paté: gordura de porco, 20% figado de pato, 15% carne de porco, 10% figado de frango, gordura de palo, leite, ovo, acidificante: E262, E325; açucar, sal nitrificado (sal, conservante: E250), farinha de arroz, Conhaque, Madelra, especiarias (mostarda), colagénio de porco, aroma natural, puré de tomate, antioxidante: E300, F330; dextrose, 8% Decoração: gordura de pato, corante E161b. Pode conter frutos de casca rija.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pate aucanard or Mousse de pato?
Overall, Pate aucanard has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pate aucanard has fewer calories: 298 kcal versus 482 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pate aucanard has less sugar: 0.7 g versus 1.7 g per 100 g.