Passionfruit Martini flavoured cider vs Sidra con pera
Overall, Sidra con pera has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Passionfruit Martini flavoured cider
Sidra con pera
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Passionfruit Martini flavour... | Sidra con pera |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 73 kcal | 54 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 11.9 g | 7.8 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 5 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sidra con pera has 26% fewer calories (54 kcal vs 73 kcal).
- Sidra con pera has 34% less sugar (7.8 g vs 11.9 g).
- Sidra con pera is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Sidra con pera lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Passionfruit Martini flavoured cider
Eplevin (vann, sukker, eplejuicekonsentrat), vann, sukker, eplejuicekonsentrat, invert sukkersirup, karamell sukkersirup, stabilisator (E414), syre (sitronsyre), naturlig aroma, karbondioksid, konserveringsmiddel (kaliumsorbat),fargestoff (E104). Inneholder sulfitt.
Sidra con pera
Sidra (_sulfitos_), zumo de pera a partir de concentrado 10%.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Passionfruit Martini flavoured cider or Sidra con pera?
Overall, Sidra con pera has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sidra con pera has fewer calories: 54 kcal versus 73 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sidra con pera has less sugar: 7.8 g versus 11.9 g per 100 g.