Comparison

Sidra con pera vs Blackberry Cider

Overall, Sidra con pera has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 ml

NutrientSidra con peraBlackberry Cider
Nutri-Score — —
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 54 kcal 60 kcal
Fat 0 g 0 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0 g
Sugars 7.8 g 7.6 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Protein 0 g 0 g
Additives04
AllergensSulphur dioxide and sulphitesNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Sidra con pera has 10% fewer calories (54 kcal vs 60 kcal).
  • Sidra con pera is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Sidra con pera lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.

Ingredients

Sidra con pera

Sidra (_sulfitos_), zumo de pera a partir de concentrado 10%.

Blackberry Cider

Agua carbonatada, mosto de manzana (agua, jarabe de glucosa, zumo de manzana a partir de concentrado), azúcar, zumo de manzana a partir de concentrado 7,5%, acidulante (ácido cítrico), aroma natural, colorantes (caramelo de sulfito amónico, carmines, antocianinas).

FAQ

Which is healthier: Sidra con pera or Blackberry Cider?

Overall, Sidra con pera has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Sidra con pera has fewer calories: 54 kcal versus 60 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Blackberry Cider has less sugar: 7.6 g versus 7.8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons