Blueberry cider vs Sidra con pera
Overall, Sidra con pera has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Blueberry cider | Sidra con pera |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 54 kcal | 54 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 7.5 g | 7.8 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 3 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sidra con pera is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Sidra con pera lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Blueberry cider
Вода, ферментирал сок от ябълки (вода, захар, сок от ябълков концентрат, калиев сорбат), захар, боровинкова база (сок от ябълков концентрат, вода, концентрат от моркови, лимонена киселина, естествен ароматизант, калиев сорбат), въглероден диоксид, лимонена киселина.
Sidra con pera
Sidra (_sulfitos_), zumo de pera a partir de concentrado 10%.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Blueberry cider or Sidra con pera?
Overall, Sidra con pera has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Blueberry cider has fewer calories: 54 kcal versus 54 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Blueberry cider has less sugar: 7.5 g versus 7.8 g per 100 g.