Somersby Blueberry vs Sidra con pera
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Somersby Blueberry | Sidra con pera |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 57 kcal | 54 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 7.8 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 3 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Somersby Blueberry has no sugar, while Sidra con pera has 7.8 g.
- Sidra con pera is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Sidra con pera lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Somersby Blueberry
Víz, almabor 29% (víz, cukor, almalésűrítmény), cukor, almalésűrítmény (20,2%), szén-dioxid, Savanyúságot szabályozó anyag: citromsav, színező koncentrátum feketerépából, tartósítószer: kálium-szorbát, természetes aroma.
Sidra con pera
Sidra (_sulfitos_), zumo de pera a partir de concentrado 10%.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Somersby Blueberry or Sidra con pera?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sidra con pera has fewer calories: 54 kcal versus 57 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Somersby Blueberry has less sugar: 0 g versus 7.8 g per 100 g.