Papua New Guinea vs Mortadela de pavo
Overall, Papua New Guinea has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Papua New Guinea | Mortadela de pavo |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | d |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 1 kcal | 159 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 10.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 2.8 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 1.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 2.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 0.2 g | 10.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Papua New Guinea has 99% fewer calories (1 kcal vs 159 kcal).
- Papua New Guinea has no fat, while Mortadela de pavo has 10.5 g.
- Papua New Guinea has no saturated fat, while Mortadela de pavo has 2.8 g.
- Papua New Guinea has no sugar, while Mortadela de pavo has 1.5 g.
- Papua New Guinea has no salt, while Mortadela de pavo has 2.1 g.
- Mortadela de pavo has 98% more protein (10.5 g vs 0.2 g).
- Papua New Guinea has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Mortadela de pavo lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Papua New Guinea
Not available.
Mortadela de pavo
MORTADELA DE PAVO, Ingrettertes, Came de pavo (49%), agua, lécula de palats, leche en polvo, sal, especias, protena de Valor energétice, 675 soja, Estabilizador: E-451, Azúcar, Arit0dante Grasa E-316, Colorante natural: E-120, Consarvador delos cuales saturae E-250, INFORMACION NUT POR 100 Hidrafos de cabor de los cuales azu
FAQ
Which is healthier: Papua New Guinea or Mortadela de pavo?
Overall, Papua New Guinea has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Papua New Guinea has fewer calories: 1 kcal versus 159 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Papua New Guinea has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.5 g per 100 g.