Comparison

Lomo de cebo ibérico vs Papua New Guinea

Overall, Papua New Guinea has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

Nutrient	Lomo de cebo ibérico	Papua New Guinea
Nutri-Score	e	a
NOVA group	—	—
Calories	289 kcal	1 kcal
Fat	20.1 g	0 g
Saturated fat	8.5 g	0 g
Sugars	0.5 g	0 g
Salt	3 g	0 g
Fiber	—	0 g
Protein	37.4 g	0.2 g
Additives	0	0
Allergens	None listed	None listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

Papua New Guinea has 100% fewer calories (1 kcal vs 289 kcal).
Papua New Guinea has no fat, while Lomo de cebo ibérico has 20.1 g.
Papua New Guinea has no saturated fat, while Lomo de cebo ibérico has 8.5 g.
Papua New Guinea has no sugar, while Lomo de cebo ibérico has 0.5 g.
Papua New Guinea has no salt, while Lomo de cebo ibérico has 3 g.
Lomo de cebo ibérico has 99% more protein (37.4 g vs 0.2 g).
Papua New Guinea has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Lomo de cebo ibérico

Not available.

Papua New Guinea

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Lomo de cebo ibérico or Papua New Guinea?

Overall, Papua New Guinea has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Papua New Guinea has fewer calories: 1 kcal versus 289 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Papua New Guinea has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons

Lomo de cebo ibérico vs Pimientos del Piquillo e... Lomo de cebo ibérico vs Llet Nostra Sencera Lomo de cebo ibérico vs Rellenas con crema de Ch... Lomo de cebo ibérico vs Pan tostado c/cebolla ca... Mix sandía vs Lomo de cebo ibérico Papua New Guinea vs Mortadela de pavo Papua New Guinea vs Pan tostado c/cebolla ca... Mix sandía vs Papua New Guinea