Pane bianco vs Stuzzi patate e paprika
Overall, Stuzzi patate e paprika has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 2.
Pane bianco
Stuzzi patate e paprika
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pane bianco | Stuzzi patate e paprika |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 298 kcal | 437 kcal |
| Fat | 15.5 g | 13.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.3 g | 1.3 g |
| Sugars | 15 g | 2.8 g |
| Salt | 14 g | 2.4 g |
| Fiber | 5.3 g | 3.6 g |
| Protein | 8.6 g | 9.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pane bianco has 32% fewer calories (298 kcal vs 437 kcal).
- Stuzzi patate e paprika has 12% less fat (13.6 g vs 15.5 g).
- Stuzzi patate e paprika has 44% less saturated fat (1.3 g vs 2.3 g).
- Stuzzi patate e paprika has 81% less sugar (2.8 g vs 15 g).
- Stuzzi patate e paprika has 83% less salt (2.4 g vs 14 g).
- Pane bianco has 32% more fiber (5.3 g vs 3.6 g).
- Stuzzi patate e paprika has the better Nutri-Score.
- Stuzzi patate e paprika is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Pane bianco
Farina di grano tenero 0, acqua, olio extravergine di oliva, destrosio, lievito di birra, sale, farina di orzo maltato
Stuzzi patate e paprika
farina di frumento, olio di girasole, fiocchi di patate 2,5%, sale marino, doppio concentrato di pomodoro, olio d'oliva, paprika 0,7%, cipolla antiossidante, estratto di rosmarino
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pane bianco or Stuzzi patate e paprika?
Overall, Stuzzi patate e paprika has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pane bianco has fewer calories: 298 kcal versus 437 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Stuzzi patate e paprika has less sugar: 2.8 g versus 15 g per 100 g.