Palak Paneer vs Salmon udon
Overall, Salmon udon has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Palak Paneer | Salmon udon |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | b |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 103 kcal | 109 kcal |
| Fat | 4.8 g | 1.3 g |
| Saturated fat | — | 1 g |
| Sugars | 1.6 g | 6.7 g |
| Salt | 10.8 g | 0.6 g |
| Fiber | 3 g | — |
| Protein | 6 g | 7.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | Eggs, Gluten, Mustard, Sesame seeds, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Salmon udon has 73% less fat (1.3 g vs 4.8 g).
- Palak Paneer has 76% less sugar (1.6 g vs 6.7 g).
- Salmon udon has 94% less salt (0.6 g vs 10.8 g).
- Salmon udon has 23% more protein (7.8 g vs 6 g).
- Only Salmon udon lists: Eggs, Gluten, Mustard, Sesame seeds, Soybeans.
Ingredients
Palak Paneer
Not available.
Salmon udon
Vařené nudle Udon 50 % (pitná voda, PŠENIČNÁ mouka, jedlá sůl, tapiokový škrob), restovaný LOSOS 20%, zelenina v různém poměru 5 % (paprika, pórek, hrášek, mrkev), omáčka [sójová omáčka (pitná voda, jedlá sůl, SÓJOVÉ boby, PŠENICE), ochucovadlo Mirin (pitná voda, cukr, vysokofruktózový kukuřičný sirup, glukóza, ocet: PŠENICE, pitná voda, kyselina: E 330, kvasničný extrakt; jedlá sůl, alkohol, zázvorový extrakt, kyselina: E 330, aroma), cukr], řepkový olej, zázvor, SEZAM. Může obsahovat stopy korýšů, vejce, arašídů, mléka, celeru, hořčice, měkkýšů, oxidu siřičitého a siřičitanů.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Palak Paneer or Salmon udon?
Overall, Salmon udon has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Palak Paneer has fewer calories: 103 kcal versus 109 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Palak Paneer has less sugar: 1.6 g versus 6.7 g per 100 g.