Comparison

Ørretfilet med skinn vs Hamburger Di Trota Iridea +Erba Cip.

Overall, Ørretfilet med skinn has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientØrretfilet med skinnHamburger Di Trota Iridea +E...
Nutri-Score a b
NOVA group — —
Calories 166 kcal 130 kcal
Fat 10 g 3.6 g
Saturated fat 2 g 1 g
Sugars 0 g 0.5 g
Salt 0.1 g 1.5 g
Fiber 0 g —
Protein 19 g 17 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Hamburger Di Trota Iridea +Erba Cip. has 22% fewer calories (130 kcal vs 166 kcal).
  • Hamburger Di Trota Iridea +Erba Cip. has 64% less fat (3.6 g vs 10 g).
  • Hamburger Di Trota Iridea +Erba Cip. has 50% less saturated fat (1 g vs 2 g).
  • Ørretfilet med skinn has no sugar, while Hamburger Di Trota Iridea +Erba Cip. has 0.5 g.
  • Ørretfilet med skinn has 92% less salt (0.1 g vs 1.5 g).
  • Ørretfilet med skinn has 11% more protein (19 g vs 17 g).
  • Ørretfilet med skinn has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Ørretfilet med skinn

Ørret (100%)

Hamburger Di Trota Iridea +Erba Cip.

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Ørretfilet med skinn or Hamburger Di Trota Iridea +Erba Cip.?

Overall, Ørretfilet med skinn has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Hamburger Di Trota Iridea +Erba Cip. has fewer calories: 130 kcal versus 166 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Ørretfilet med skinn has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons