Ørretfilet med skinn vs Hamburger Di Trota Iridea +Erba Cip.
Overall, Ørretfilet med skinn has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.
Ørretfilet med skinn
Hamburger Di Trota Iridea +Erba Cip.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Ørretfilet med skinn | Hamburger Di Trota Iridea +E... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 166 kcal | 130 kcal |
| Fat | 10 g | 3.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 2 g | 1 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 1.5 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 19 g | 17 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Hamburger Di Trota Iridea +Erba Cip. has 22% fewer calories (130 kcal vs 166 kcal).
- Hamburger Di Trota Iridea +Erba Cip. has 64% less fat (3.6 g vs 10 g).
- Hamburger Di Trota Iridea +Erba Cip. has 50% less saturated fat (1 g vs 2 g).
- Ørretfilet med skinn has no sugar, while Hamburger Di Trota Iridea +Erba Cip. has 0.5 g.
- Ørretfilet med skinn has 92% less salt (0.1 g vs 1.5 g).
- Ørretfilet med skinn has 11% more protein (19 g vs 17 g).
- Ørretfilet med skinn has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Ørretfilet med skinn
Ørret (100%)
Hamburger Di Trota Iridea +Erba Cip.
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Ørretfilet med skinn or Hamburger Di Trota Iridea +Erba Cip.?
Overall, Ørretfilet med skinn has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Hamburger Di Trota Iridea +Erba Cip. has fewer calories: 130 kcal versus 166 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Ørretfilet med skinn has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.