Comparison

Original irische Süßrahmbutter vs Mischstreichfett gesalzen

Overall, Mischstreichfett gesalzen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientOriginal irische Süßrahmbutt...Mischstreichfett gesalzen
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 2 2
Calories 748 kcal 589 kcal
Fat 82.5 g 65 g
Saturated fat 56 g 35.6 g
Sugars 0.7 g 0.5 g
Salt 0 g 1 g
Fiber 0 g —
Protein 0.7 g 0.4 g
Additives00
AllergensMilkNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Mischstreichfett gesalzen has 21% fewer calories (589 kcal vs 748 kcal).
  • Mischstreichfett gesalzen has 21% less fat (65 g vs 82.5 g).
  • Mischstreichfett gesalzen has 36% less saturated fat (35.6 g vs 56 g).
  • Original irische Süßrahmbutter has 98% less salt (0 g vs 1 g).
  • Only Original irische Süßrahmbutter lists: Milk.

Ingredients

Original irische Süßrahmbutter

Süßrahmbutter

Mischstreichfett gesalzen

63% mildgesäuerte Butter, Wasser, 13% Rapsöl, 1% Speisesalz.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Original irische Süßrahmbutter or Mischstreichfett gesalzen?

Overall, Mischstreichfett gesalzen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Mischstreichfett gesalzen has fewer calories: 589 kcal versus 748 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Mischstreichfett gesalzen has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.7 g per 100 g.

More comparisons