Original irische Süßrahmbutter vs Mischstreichfett gesalzen
Overall, Mischstreichfett gesalzen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Original irische Süßrahmbutter
Mischstreichfett gesalzen
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Original irische Süßrahmbutt... | Mischstreichfett gesalzen |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 2 | 2 |
| Calories | 748 kcal | 589 kcal |
| Fat | 82.5 g | 65 g |
| Saturated fat | 56 g | 35.6 g |
| Sugars | 0.7 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 0.7 g | 0.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Mischstreichfett gesalzen has 21% fewer calories (589 kcal vs 748 kcal).
- Mischstreichfett gesalzen has 21% less fat (65 g vs 82.5 g).
- Mischstreichfett gesalzen has 36% less saturated fat (35.6 g vs 56 g).
- Original irische Süßrahmbutter has 98% less salt (0 g vs 1 g).
- Only Original irische Süßrahmbutter lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Original irische Süßrahmbutter
Süßrahmbutter
Mischstreichfett gesalzen
63% mildgesäuerte Butter, Wasser, 13% Rapsöl, 1% Speisesalz.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Original irische Süßrahmbutter or Mischstreichfett gesalzen?
Overall, Mischstreichfett gesalzen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Mischstreichfett gesalzen has fewer calories: 589 kcal versus 748 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Mischstreichfett gesalzen has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.7 g per 100 g.