Comparison
Original irische Süßrahmbutter vs Sorensens
Overall, Sorensens has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Original irische Süßrahmbutt... | Sorensens |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | — |
| NOVA group | 2 | 2 |
| Calories | 748 kcal | 589 kcal |
| Fat | 82.5 g | 65 g |
| Saturated fat | 56 g | 35 g |
| Sugars | 0.7 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | — |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 0.7 g | 0.6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sorensens has 21% fewer calories (589 kcal vs 748 kcal).
- Sorensens has 21% less fat (65 g vs 82.5 g).
- Sorensens has 38% less saturated fat (35 g vs 56 g).
Ingredients
Original irische Süßrahmbutter
Süßrahmbutter
Sorensens
Mischstreichtett aus butter und rapsöl, Fet gesamtfett, Milchfet', Pflanzenfett, Wasser, Rapsöl, Magermilchjoghurt
FAQ
Which is healthier: Original irische Süßrahmbutter or Sorensens?
Overall, Sorensens has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Sorensens has fewer calories: 589 kcal versus 748 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Sorensens has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.7 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Sorensens vs Sonnenblumenmargarine
Exquisa Kräuter vs Sorensens
Original irische Süßrahm... vs Sonnenblumenmargarine
Original irische Süßrahm... vs Exquisa Kräuter
Pflanzen Margarine vs Sorensens
Original irische Süßrahm... vs Pflanzen Margarine
Mischstreichfett gesalze... vs Sorensens
Original irische Süßrahm... vs Mischstreichfett gesalze...