Organic & Gluten Free Pasta - Elbows vs Tortils Cèpes
Overall, Tortils Cèpes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 4.
Organic & Gluten Free Pasta - Elbows
Tortils Cèpes
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Organic & Gluten Free Pasta... | Tortils Cèpes |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 3 |
| Calories | 200 kcal | 347 kcal |
| Fat | 2 g | 1.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 4.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 3 g | 8.2 g |
| Protein | 4 g | 11.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Organic & Gluten Free Pasta - Elbows has 42% fewer calories (200 kcal vs 347 kcal).
- Tortils Cèpes has 30% less fat (1.4 g vs 2 g).
- Organic & Gluten Free Pasta - Elbows has no saturated fat, while Tortils Cèpes has 0.3 g.
- Organic & Gluten Free Pasta - Elbows has no sugar, while Tortils Cèpes has 4.5 g.
- Tortils Cèpes has 63% more fiber (8.2 g vs 3 g).
- Tortils Cèpes has 65% more protein (11.4 g vs 4 g).
- Tortils Cèpes has the better Nutri-Score.
- Organic & Gluten Free Pasta - Elbows is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Tortils Cèpes lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Organic & Gluten Free Pasta - Elbows
Organic Corn Flour, Organic Brown Rice Flour, Organic Quinoa Flour
Tortils Cèpes
Semoule demi-complète de _blé dur_*, cèpes* 4%. *issus de l'agriculture biologique.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Organic & Gluten Free Pasta - Elbows or Tortils Cèpes?
Overall, Tortils Cèpes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Organic & Gluten Free Pasta - Elbows has fewer calories: 200 kcal versus 347 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Organic & Gluten Free Pasta - Elbows has less sugar: 0 g versus 4.5 g per 100 g.