Orange Medium Cut Marmalade vs Abricot pays
Overall, Abricot pays has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Orange Medium Cut Marmalade | Abricot pays |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 273 kcal | 237 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 66 g | 52 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0.7 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | Orange | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Abricot pays has 13% fewer calories (237 kcal vs 273 kcal).
- Orange Medium Cut Marmalade has no fat, while Abricot pays has 0.5 g.
- Abricot pays has 21% less sugar (52 g vs 66 g).
- Abricot pays has 100% more fiber (0.7 g vs 0 g).
- Abricot pays has 100% more protein (0.5 g vs 0 g).
- Orange Medium Cut Marmalade is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Orange Medium Cut Marmalade lists: Orange.
Ingredients
Orange Medium Cut Marmalade
Sugar, Seville oranges
Abricot pays
Purée d'Abricot pays (8096), sucre, gélifiant : pectine de fruit, acidifiant : acide citrique. Teneur en fruits : 80 g pour 100 g, Teneur totale ensucres : 62 g
FAQ
Which is healthier: Orange Medium Cut Marmalade or Abricot pays?
Overall, Abricot pays has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Abricot pays has fewer calories: 237 kcal versus 273 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Abricot pays has less sugar: 52 g versus 66 g per 100 g.