Comparison
Operas vs Opera
Overall, Operas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Operas | Opera |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | — |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 322 kcal | 347 kcal |
| Fat | 21 g | 23 g |
| Saturated fat | 11 g | 12 g |
| Sugars | 21 g | 24 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | — |
| Fiber | 2 g | — |
| Protein | 4.9 g | 4.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Operas has 13% less sugar (21 g vs 24 g).
Ingredients
Operas
Not available.
Opera
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Operas or Opera?
Overall, Operas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Operas has fewer calories: 322 kcal versus 347 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Operas has less sugar: 21 g versus 24 g per 100 g.