Comparison
Opera vs Operas
Overall, Operas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Opera | Operas |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 378 kcal | 322 kcal |
| Fat | 25.2 g | 21 g |
| Saturated fat | 15.4 g | 11 g |
| Sugars | 26.4 g | 21 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | — | 2 g |
| Protein | 4.5 g | 4.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Operas has 15% fewer calories (322 kcal vs 378 kcal).
- Operas has 17% less fat (21 g vs 25.2 g).
- Operas has 29% less saturated fat (11 g vs 15.4 g).
- Operas has 20% less sugar (21 g vs 26.4 g).
Ingredients
Opera
Not available.
Operas
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Opera or Operas?
Overall, Operas has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Operas has fewer calories: 322 kcal versus 378 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Operas has less sugar: 21 g versus 26.4 g per 100 g.