Omega 3 EPA + DHA 60% vs Omega-3 fischöl
Overall, Omega-3 fischöl has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Omega 3 EPA + DHA 60%
Omega-3 fischöl
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Omega 3 EPA + DHA 60% | Omega-3 fischöl |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | b |
| NOVA group | 4 | 2 |
| Calories | 728 kcal | 11 kcal |
| Fat | 72 g | 1 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.8 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 1 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 14.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Omega-3 fischöl has 98% fewer calories (11 kcal vs 728 kcal).
- Omega-3 fischöl has 99% less fat (1 g vs 72 g).
- Omega-3 fischöl has 94% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 1.8 g).
- Omega-3 fischöl has no sugar, while Omega 3 EPA + DHA 60% has 1 g.
- Omega 3 EPA + DHA 60% has 97% more protein (14.5 g vs 0.5 g).
- Omega-3 fischöl is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Omega 3 EPA + DHA 60% lists: Fish.
Ingredients
Omega 3 EPA + DHA 60%
_Fisch_öl (aus Peruanischen Sardellen), Kapselhülle (Rinder-Gelatine, Glycerin, Wasser), gemischte natürliche Tocopherole
Omega-3 fischöl
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Omega 3 EPA + DHA 60% or Omega-3 fischöl?
Overall, Omega-3 fischöl has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Omega-3 fischöl has fewer calories: 11 kcal versus 728 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Omega-3 fischöl has less sugar: 0 g versus 1 g per 100 g.