Oméga 3 vs TOURNESOLTartine et Cuisine - DEMI-SEL
Overall, Oméga 3 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Oméga 3 | TOURNESOLTartine et Cuisine... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 451 kcal | 543 kcal |
| Fat | 50 g | 60 g |
| Saturated fat | 13 g | 13 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0.4 g | 1.4 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 6 | 4 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Oméga 3 has 17% fewer calories (451 kcal vs 543 kcal).
- Oméga 3 has 17% less fat (50 g vs 60 g).
- Oméga 3 has 71% less salt (0.4 g vs 1.4 g).
- Oméga 3 has 100% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0 g).
- Oméga 3 has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Oméga 3
Eau, huiles et graisses végétales non hydrogénées (colza 28,5%, palme, palmiste, lin 5%, coprah), sel 0,4%, émulsifiants : mono et diglycérides d'acides gras, lécithine de tournesol poudre de LAIT partiellement écrémé, arôme, conservateur : sorbate de potassium acidifiant : acide lactique colorant : caroténoïdes.
TOURNESOLTartine et Cuisine - DEMI-SEL
Huiles et graisses végétales non hydrogénées 60% (tournesol 30 %, colza 18%, palme), eau, sel 1,4%, poudre de LAIT écrémé, émulsifiant : esters citriques des mono - et diglycérides d'acides gras conservateur : sorbate de potassium acidifiant : acide citrique arôme, vitamine E colorant : caroténoïdes.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Oméga 3 or TOURNESOLTartine et Cuisine - DEMI-SEL?
Overall, Oméga 3 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Oméga 3 has fewer calories: 451 kcal versus 543 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Oméga 3 has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.