Olives vertes à l'orientale vs Pitted greek colossal olives
Overall, Pitted greek colossal olives has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Olives vertes à l'orientale
Pitted greek colossal olives
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Olives vertes à l'orientale | Pitted greek colossal olives |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 217 kcal | 138 kcal |
| Fat | 23 g | 13.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.4 g | 2.4 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 2.6 g | 3.4 g |
| Fiber | 2.7 g | 3.1 g |
| Protein | 1 g | 1 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pitted greek colossal olives has 36% fewer calories (138 kcal vs 217 kcal).
- Pitted greek colossal olives has 42% less fat (13.4 g vs 23 g).
- Pitted greek colossal olives has no sugar, while Olives vertes à l'orientale has 0.5 g.
- Olives vertes à l'orientale has 23% less salt (2.6 g vs 3.4 g).
- Pitted greek colossal olives has 13% more fiber (3.1 g vs 2.7 g).
- Only Olives vertes à l'orientale lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Olives vertes à l'orientale
Olives vertes dénoyautées 66,7% (olives vertes, sel, acidifiant: acide lactique), huile de colza, piments 6,45%, poivrons 6,3%, ail 0,4%, persil 0,13 %. Contient des sulfites.
Pitted greek colossal olives
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Olives vertes à l'orientale or Pitted greek colossal olives?
Overall, Pitted greek colossal olives has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pitted greek colossal olives has fewer calories: 138 kcal versus 217 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pitted greek colossal olives has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.