Olives Apero a la marocaine vs Olives Noires Aromarisées
Overall, Olives Apero a la marocaine has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Olives Apero a la marocaine
Olives Noires Aromarisées
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Olives Apero a la marocaine | Olives Noires Aromarisées |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 168 kcal | 389 kcal |
| Fat | 18 g | 35.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 3 g | 5.7 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 4 g | 8 g |
| Fiber | — | 5.5 g |
| Protein | 1 g | 1.9 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Olives Apero a la marocaine has 57% fewer calories (168 kcal vs 389 kcal).
- Olives Apero a la marocaine has 50% less fat (18 g vs 35.9 g).
- Olives Apero a la marocaine has 47% less saturated fat (3 g vs 5.7 g).
- Olives Noires Aromarisées has no sugar, while Olives Apero a la marocaine has 0.5 g.
- Olives Apero a la marocaine has 50% less salt (4 g vs 8 g).
- Olives Noires Aromarisées has 47% more protein (1.9 g vs 1 g).
Ingredients
Olives Apero a la marocaine
Olives vertes dénoyautées, olives noires ou naturel entières, sel, carotte (4%), huile d'olive vierge extra, (2%), épices (2,5%), correcteur d'acidité : acide citrique, antioxydant : acide ascorbique.
Olives Noires Aromarisées
olives, sel, huile d'olive, herbes de Provence
FAQ
Which is healthier: Olives Apero a la marocaine or Olives Noires Aromarisées?
Overall, Olives Apero a la marocaine has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Olives Apero a la marocaine has fewer calories: 168 kcal versus 389 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Olives Noires Aromarisées has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.