Comparison
Oignon de France vs Rostad Lök
Overall, Oignon de France has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 9 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Oignon de France | Rostad Lök |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | 1 | 3 |
| Calories | 350 kcal | 590 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 44 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 21 g |
| Sugars | 37.7 g | 9 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 1.2 g |
| Fiber | 9.3 g | 5 g |
| Protein | 9 g | 6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Oignon de France has 41% fewer calories (350 kcal vs 590 kcal).
- Oignon de France has 99% less fat (0.5 g vs 44 g).
- Oignon de France has 100% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 21 g).
- Rostad Lök has 76% less sugar (9 g vs 37.7 g).
- Oignon de France has 96% less salt (0.1 g vs 1.2 g).
- Oignon de France has 46% more fiber (9.3 g vs 5 g).
- Oignon de France has 33% more protein (9 g vs 6 g).
- Oignon de France has the better Nutri-Score.
- Oignon de France is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Rostad Lök lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Oignon de France
oignon déshydraté.
Rostad Lök
Lök*, palmolja*, vetemjöl, salt.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Oignon de France or Rostad Lök?
Overall, Oignon de France has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Oignon de France has fewer calories: 350 kcal versus 590 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Rostad Lök has less sugar: 9 g versus 37.7 g per 100 g.