Comparison
Cebula mielona vs Rostad Lök
Overall, Cebula mielona has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Cebula mielona | Rostad Lök |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | d |
| NOVA group | 1 | 3 |
| Calories | 39 kcal | 590 kcal |
| Fat | 0.6 g | 44 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 21 g |
| Sugars | 4.8 g | 9 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 1.2 g |
| Fiber | 1.7 g | 5 g |
| Protein | 1.1 g | 6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Cebula mielona has 93% fewer calories (39 kcal vs 590 kcal).
- Cebula mielona has 99% less fat (0.6 g vs 44 g).
- Cebula mielona has 99% less saturated fat (0.2 g vs 21 g).
- Cebula mielona has 47% less sugar (4.8 g vs 9 g).
- Cebula mielona has 92% less salt (0.1 g vs 1.2 g).
- Rostad Lök has 66% more fiber (5 g vs 1.7 g).
- Rostad Lök has 82% more protein (6 g vs 1.1 g).
- Cebula mielona is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Rostad Lök lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Cebula mielona
cebula mielona
Rostad Lök
Lök*, palmolja*, vetemjöl, salt.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Cebula mielona or Rostad Lök?
Overall, Cebula mielona has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Cebula mielona has fewer calories: 39 kcal versus 590 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Cebula mielona has less sugar: 4.8 g versus 9 g per 100 g.