Obazda klassisch vs Camembert di bufala
Overall, Camembert di bufala has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Obazda klassisch | Camembert di bufala |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 328 kcal | 305 kcal |
| Fat | 29 g | 28 g |
| Saturated fat | 19 g | 20 g |
| Sugars | 1.5 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1.7 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0.4 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 13 g | 13 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Camembert di bufala has no sugar, while Obazda klassisch has 1.5 g.
- Camembert di bufala has no salt, while Obazda klassisch has 1.7 g.
- Obazda klassisch has 100% more fiber (0.4 g vs 0 g).
- Camembert di bufala has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Obazda klassisch
53% Camembert, Rahm; Butter; Frischkäse, Zwiebeln; Salz, Gewürze, Kümmel
Camembert di bufala
Lait de bufflonne pasteurisé, sel, enzyme coagulante d'origine microbienne, ferments lactiques (lait), Penicillium Candidum.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Obazda klassisch or Camembert di bufala?
Overall, Camembert di bufala has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Camembert di bufala has fewer calories: 305 kcal versus 328 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Camembert di bufala has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.5 g per 100 g.