Camembert thermisé moulé à la louche vs Obazda klassisch
Overall, Camembert thermisé moulé à la louche has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Camembert thermisé moulé à la louche
Obazda klassisch
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Camembert thermisé moulé à l... | Obazda klassisch |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 279 kcal | 328 kcal |
| Fat | 22 g | 29 g |
| Saturated fat | 16 g | 19 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 1.5 g |
| Salt | 1.7 g | 1.7 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | 0.4 g |
| Protein | 20 g | 13 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Camembert thermisé moulé à la louche has 15% fewer calories (279 kcal vs 328 kcal).
- Camembert thermisé moulé à la louche has 24% less fat (22 g vs 29 g).
- Camembert thermisé moulé à la louche has 16% less saturated fat (16 g vs 19 g).
- Camembert thermisé moulé à la louche has no sugar, while Obazda klassisch has 1.5 g.
- Camembert thermisé moulé à la louche has 35% more protein (20 g vs 13 g).
Ingredients
Camembert thermisé moulé à la louche
Lait de vache thermisé (origine : France), ferments (dont lait), sel, présure.
Obazda klassisch
53% Camembert, Rahm; Butter; Frischkäse, Zwiebeln; Salz, Gewürze, Kümmel
FAQ
Which is healthier: Camembert thermisé moulé à la louche or Obazda klassisch?
Overall, Camembert thermisé moulé à la louche has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Camembert thermisé moulé à la louche has fewer calories: 279 kcal versus 328 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Camembert thermisé moulé à la louche has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.5 g per 100 g.