Nüsse: Macadamia vs Macadamia Nuts
Overall, Macadamia Nuts has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Nüsse: Macadamia | Macadamia Nuts |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | b |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 754 kcal | 766 kcal |
| Fat | 76 g | 77.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 13 g | 11.6 g |
| Sugars | 4.3 g | 3 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 9 g | 5.9 g |
| Protein | 8.7 g | 8.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Macadamia Nuts has 11% less saturated fat (11.6 g vs 13 g).
- Macadamia Nuts has 30% less sugar (3 g vs 4.3 g).
- Macadamia Nuts has 99% less salt (0 g vs 1 g).
- Nüsse: Macadamia has 34% more fiber (9 g vs 5.9 g).
- Macadamia Nuts has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Nüsse: Macadamia
Macadamia-Nusskerne, Speisesalz (1 %). Produkt kann Spuren von Erdnusskernen und anderen Schalenfrüchten enthalten.
Macadamia Nuts
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Nüsse: Macadamia or Macadamia Nuts?
Overall, Macadamia Nuts has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Nüsse: Macadamia has fewer calories: 754 kcal versus 766 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Macadamia Nuts has less sugar: 3 g versus 4.3 g per 100 g.