Non-stick cooking spray (canola oil) vs Original cooking spray
Overall, Non-stick cooking spray (canola oil) has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Non-stick cooking spray (can... | Original cooking spray |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | d |
| NOVA group | 1 | 4 |
| Calories | 0 kcal | 792 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 79 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 5 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Non-stick cooking spray (canola oil) has no calories, while Original cooking spray has 792 kcal.
- Non-stick cooking spray (canola oil) has no fat, while Original cooking spray has 79 g.
- Non-stick cooking spray (canola oil) has no saturated fat, while Original cooking spray has 5 g.
- Non-stick cooking spray (canola oil) has the better Nutri-Score.
- Non-stick cooking spray (canola oil) is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Original cooking spray lists: Soybeans.
Ingredients
Non-stick cooking spray (canola oil)
Organic canola oil
Original cooking spray
canola oil*, palm oil*, coconut oil*, lecithin from soybeans (non-stick agent), dimethyl silicone (for anti-foaming), contains soy, also contains propellant to dispense spray, *adds a trivial amount of fat,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Non-stick cooking spray (canola oil) or Original cooking spray?
Overall, Non-stick cooking spray (canola oil) has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Non-stick cooking spray (canola oil) has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 792 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Non-stick cooking spray (canola oil) has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.