Original cooking spray vs Non-Stick Cooking Spray
Overall, Non-Stick Cooking Spray has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Original cooking spray | Non-Stick Cooking Spray |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 792 kcal | 0 kcal |
| Fat | 79 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 5 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 5 |
| Allergens | Soybeans | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Non-Stick Cooking Spray has no calories, while Original cooking spray has 792 kcal.
- Non-Stick Cooking Spray has no fat, while Original cooking spray has 79 g.
- Non-Stick Cooking Spray has no saturated fat, while Original cooking spray has 5 g.
- Non-Stick Cooking Spray has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Original cooking spray lists: Soybeans.
Ingredients
Original cooking spray
canola oil*, palm oil*, coconut oil*, lecithin from soybeans (non-stick agent), dimethyl silicone (for anti-foaming), contains soy, also contains propellant to dispense spray, *adds a trivial amount of fat,
Non-Stick Cooking Spray
CANOLA OIL, SUNFLOWER LECITHIN, PROPELLANT (BUTANE, ISOBUTANE AND/OR PROPANE)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Original cooking spray or Non-Stick Cooking Spray?
Overall, Non-Stick Cooking Spray has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Non-Stick Cooking Spray has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 792 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Original cooking spray has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.