Comparison

Nesquik vs Cereal de trigo e milho torrado, com cacau

Overall, Cereal de trigo e milho torrado, com cacau has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientNesquikCereal de trigo e milho torr...
Nutri-Score c b
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 377 kcal 378 kcal
Fat 2.8 g 3 g
Saturated fat 1.1 g 0.7 g
Sugars 22.4 g 22.1 g
Salt 0.2 g 0.2 g
Fiber 8.6 g 9.3 g
Protein 8.5 g 8.7 g
Additives00
AllergensGlutenGluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Cereal de trigo e milho torrado, com cacau has 36% less saturated fat (0.7 g vs 1.1 g).
  • Cereal de trigo e milho torrado, com cacau has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Nesquik

whole wheat flour (51,4%), sugar, corn grits (17,2%), dehydrated glucose syrup, defatted cocoa powder (5,6%), calcium carbonate, salt, natural flavouring, iron, niacin, pantothenic acid, vitamin d, vitamin b6, thiamine, riboflavin, folic acid, may contain milk, peanuts and nuts, to produce 100 g of this product we have used 53,1 g of whole grain,

Cereal de trigo e milho torrado, com cacau

Farinha de _trigo_ integral (53,1%), açúcar, sémola de milho (17,2%), xarope de glucose, cacau magro em pó (5,6%), carbonato de cálcio, contém óleo de girassol e/ou óleo de palma, sal, aromas naturais, ferro, niacina, ácido pantoténico, vitamina D, vitamina B6, tiamina, riboflavina, ácido fólico.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Nesquik or Cereal de trigo e milho torrado, com cacau?

Overall, Cereal de trigo e milho torrado, com cacau has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Nesquik has fewer calories: 377 kcal versus 378 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Cereal de trigo e milho torrado, com cacau has less sugar: 22.1 g versus 22.4 g per 100 g.

More comparisons