Billes O' Cacao vs Nesquik
Overall, Billes O' Cacao has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Billes O' Cacao | Nesquik |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 370 kcal | 377 kcal |
| Fat | 2.9 g | 2.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.7 g | 1.1 g |
| Sugars | 19 g | 22.4 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 11 g | 8.6 g |
| Protein | 9.4 g | 8.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Milk, Peanuts | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Billes O' Cacao has 36% less saturated fat (0.7 g vs 1.1 g).
- Billes O' Cacao has 15% less sugar (19 g vs 22.4 g).
- Billes O' Cacao has 22% more fiber (11 g vs 8.6 g).
- Billes O' Cacao has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Billes O' Cacao lists: Milk, Peanuts.
Ingredients
Billes O' Cacao
Céréales 81% (farine de blé complet 58%, semoule de maïs), sucre, poudre de cacao maigre 6%, huile de tournesol, arômes naturels, sels minéraux : fer. Peut contenir : autres céréales contenant du gluten, fruits à coque, lait et sulfites.% exprimés sur le produit fini.
Nesquik
whole wheat flour (51,4%), sugar, corn grits (17,2%), dehydrated glucose syrup, defatted cocoa powder (5,6%), calcium carbonate, salt, natural flavouring, iron, niacin, pantothenic acid, vitamin d, vitamin b6, thiamine, riboflavin, folic acid, may contain milk, peanuts and nuts, to produce 100 g of this product we have used 53,1 g of whole grain,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Billes O' Cacao or Nesquik?
Overall, Billes O' Cacao has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Billes O' Cacao has fewer calories: 370 kcal versus 377 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Billes O' Cacao has less sugar: 19 g versus 22.4 g per 100 g.