Comparison

Billes O' Cacao vs Choco Bollz

Overall, Billes O' Cacao has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientBilles O' CacaoChoco Bollz
Nutri-Score b c
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 370 kcal 380 kcal
Fat 2.9 g 2.4 g
Saturated fat 0.7 g 1 g
Sugars 19 g 22 g
Salt 0 g 0.4 g
Fiber 11 g 7.5 g
Protein 9.4 g 8.7 g
Additives00
AllergensGluten, Milk, PeanutsGluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Choco Bollz has 17% less fat (2.4 g vs 2.9 g).
  • Billes O' Cacao has 30% less saturated fat (0.7 g vs 1 g).
  • Billes O' Cacao has 14% less sugar (19 g vs 22 g).
  • Billes O' Cacao has 98% less salt (0 g vs 0.4 g).
  • Billes O' Cacao has 32% more fiber (11 g vs 7.5 g).
  • Billes O' Cacao has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Billes O' Cacao lists: Milk, Peanuts.

Ingredients

Billes O' Cacao

Céréales 81% (farine de blé complet 58%, semoule de maïs), sucre, poudre de cacao maigre 6%, huile de tournesol, arômes naturels, sels minéraux : fer. Peut contenir : autres céréales contenant du gluten, fruits à coque, lait et sulfites.% exprimés sur le produit fini.

Choco Bollz

Semoule de maïs 33%, farine de _blé_ complet 22%, chocolat en poudre 18% (sucre, cacao en poudre), farine de _blé_ 14%, sucre, sirop de glucose, fructo-oligosaccharides, sel, arôme naturel. Peut contenir des traces d'arachides, de fruits à coque, de lait, de soja, de graines de sésame, de moutarde et de lupin.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Billes O' Cacao or Choco Bollz?

Overall, Billes O' Cacao has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Billes O' Cacao has fewer calories: 370 kcal versus 380 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Billes O' Cacao has less sugar: 19 g versus 22 g per 100 g.

More comparisons