Comparison

Napolact vs Proteim Shake Vanilla

Overall, Proteim Shake Vanilla has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 ml

NutrientNapolactProteim Shake Vanilla
Nutri-Score c a
NOVA group — 4
Calories 62 kcal 60 kcal
Fat 3.5 g 0 g
Saturated fat 2.1 g 0 g
Sugars 4.5 g 4.8 g
Salt 0.1 g 0.1 g
Protein 3.2 g 10 g
Additives03
AllergensMilkMilk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Proteim Shake Vanilla has no fat, while Napolact has 3.5 g.
  • Proteim Shake Vanilla has no saturated fat, while Napolact has 2.1 g.
  • Proteim Shake Vanilla has 68% more protein (10 g vs 3.2 g).
  • Proteim Shake Vanilla has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Napolact

Lapte de vacă. Conţine lactoză din laptel per 100ml per portie 200ml 260kJ/62kcal | 520kJ/124kcal (5%) informatil nutritionale Valoarea energetică Gräsiin! din care acizi graşi saturați Glucide din care zaharuri Sare 9g (10%) 6,4g (13 %) 0,12g (2%) 250mg (31,2%*** "Continutul de sare se datorează exclusiv prezentei naturale a sodiului Consumul de referintă al unul adult obişnuit (8400kJ/2000kca0 "VNR-Valorile nutritionale de referinţă Ambalajul contine 8,5 portli. O porţie conţine 200 ml Bogat in proteine. Sursă de calciu.

Proteim Shake Vanilla

Retentat din lapte 98%, proteine din lapte, stabilizator durati de potasiu, guma Gellan, colorant beta caroten, aroma natural extract natural de vanilie, indulcitor sucraloză

FAQ

Which is healthier: Napolact or Proteim Shake Vanilla?

Overall, Proteim Shake Vanilla has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Proteim Shake Vanilla has fewer calories: 60 kcal versus 62 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Napolact has less sugar: 4.5 g versus 4.8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons