Muslo de pato en confit vs Foie gras de canard entier
Overall, Muslo de pato en confit has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Muslo de pato en confit | Foie gras de canard entier |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 277 kcal | 586 kcal |
| Fat | 20 g | 61.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 6.6 g | 26.9 g |
| Sugars | 0.8 g | 1.2 g |
| Salt | 1.7 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 19 g | 7.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Muslo de pato en confit has 53% fewer calories (277 kcal vs 586 kcal).
- Muslo de pato en confit has 68% less fat (20 g vs 61.9 g).
- Muslo de pato en confit has 75% less saturated fat (6.6 g vs 26.9 g).
- Muslo de pato en confit has 33% less sugar (0.8 g vs 1.2 g).
- Foie gras de canard entier has 52% less salt (0.8 g vs 1.7 g).
- Muslo de pato en confit has 63% more protein (19 g vs 7.1 g).
- Muslo de pato en confit has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Muslo de pato en confit
Not available.
Foie gras de canard entier
Foie gras de canard, sel, Vieil Armagnac, poivre, sucre,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Muslo de pato en confit or Foie gras de canard entier?
Overall, Muslo de pato en confit has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Muslo de pato en confit has fewer calories: 277 kcal versus 586 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Muslo de pato en confit has less sugar: 0.8 g versus 1.2 g per 100 g.