Comparison

Muslo de pato en confit vs Foie gras de canard entier

Overall, Muslo de pato en confit has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientMuslo de pato en confitFoie gras de canard entier
Nutri-Score d e
NOVA group — 3
Calories 277 kcal 586 kcal
Fat 20 g 61.9 g
Saturated fat 6.6 g 26.9 g
Sugars 0.8 g 1.2 g
Salt 1.7 g 0.8 g
Fiber — 0 g
Protein 19 g 7.1 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Muslo de pato en confit has 53% fewer calories (277 kcal vs 586 kcal).
  • Muslo de pato en confit has 68% less fat (20 g vs 61.9 g).
  • Muslo de pato en confit has 75% less saturated fat (6.6 g vs 26.9 g).
  • Muslo de pato en confit has 33% less sugar (0.8 g vs 1.2 g).
  • Foie gras de canard entier has 52% less salt (0.8 g vs 1.7 g).
  • Muslo de pato en confit has 63% more protein (19 g vs 7.1 g).
  • Muslo de pato en confit has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Muslo de pato en confit

Not available.

Foie gras de canard entier

Foie gras de canard, sel, Vieil Armagnac, poivre, sucre,

FAQ

Which is healthier: Muslo de pato en confit or Foie gras de canard entier?

Overall, Muslo de pato en confit has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Muslo de pato en confit has fewer calories: 277 kcal versus 586 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Muslo de pato en confit has less sugar: 0.8 g versus 1.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons