Moules de corde de Zélande vs Moules De Corde Bio
Overall, Moules de corde de Zélande has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Moules de corde de Zélande | Moules De Corde Bio |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | c |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 125 kcal | 50 kcal |
| Fat | 3.1 g | 1 g |
| Saturated fat | 1 g | 0.6 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 1.5 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 17 g | 10 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Molluscs |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Moules De Corde Bio has 60% fewer calories (50 kcal vs 125 kcal).
- Moules De Corde Bio has 68% less fat (1 g vs 3.1 g).
- Moules De Corde Bio has 43% less saturated fat (0.6 g vs 1 g).
- Moules de corde de Zélande has 35% less salt (1 g vs 1.5 g).
- Moules de corde de Zélande has 41% more protein (17 g vs 10 g).
- Moules de corde de Zélande has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Moules De Corde Bio lists: Molluscs.
Ingredients
Moules de corde de Zélande
Not available.
Moules De Corde Bio
Moules non triploïdes (mytilus edulis) bio d'irlande
FAQ
Which is healthier: Moules de corde de Zélande or Moules De Corde Bio?
Overall, Moules de corde de Zélande has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Moules De Corde Bio has fewer calories: 50 kcal versus 125 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Moules de corde de Zélande has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.