Comparison
Moules de corde de Zélande vs Moules de corde
Overall, Moules de corde has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Moules de corde de Zélande | Moules de corde |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 125 kcal | 79 kcal |
| Fat | 3.1 g | 1.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 1 g | 0.4 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 0.7 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 17 g | 15 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Moules de corde has 37% fewer calories (79 kcal vs 125 kcal).
- Moules de corde has 61% less fat (1.2 g vs 3.1 g).
- Moules de corde has 65% less saturated fat (0.4 g vs 1 g).
- Moules de corde de Zélande has no sugar, while Moules de corde has 0.5 g.
- Moules de corde de Zélande has 12% more protein (17 g vs 15 g).
Ingredients
Moules de corde de Zélande
Not available.
Moules de corde
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Moules de corde de Zélande or Moules de corde?
Overall, Moules de corde has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Moules de corde has fewer calories: 79 kcal versus 125 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Moules de corde de Zélande has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Moules de cordes bio vs Moules de corde
Moules de corde de Zélan... vs Moules De Corde Bio
Moules De Corde Bio vs Moules de corde
Moules de corde de Zélan... vs Moules de corde
Moules de corde de Zélan... vs Moules de corde
Moules de corde de Zélan... vs Moules de cordes bio
Moules de corde de Zélan... vs Moule de cordes
Moule de cordes vs Moules de corde