Comparison

Moules de corde de Zélande vs Moule de cordes

Overall, Moules de corde de Zélande has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientMoules de corde de ZélandeMoule de cordes
Nutri-Score a c
NOVA group — —
Calories 125 kcal 57 kcal
Fat 3.1 g 0.9 g
Saturated fat 1 g 0.3 g
Sugars 0 g 0.6 g
Salt 1 g 1.5 g
Fiber 0 g —
Protein 17 g 7.3 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Moule de cordes has 54% fewer calories (57 kcal vs 125 kcal).
  • Moule de cordes has 71% less fat (0.9 g vs 3.1 g).
  • Moule de cordes has 70% less saturated fat (0.3 g vs 1 g).
  • Moules de corde de Zélande has no sugar, while Moule de cordes has 0.6 g.
  • Moules de corde de Zélande has 33% less salt (1 g vs 1.5 g).
  • Moules de corde de Zélande has 57% more protein (17 g vs 7.3 g).
  • Moules de corde de Zélande has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Moules de corde de Zélande

Not available.

Moule de cordes

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Moules de corde de Zélande or Moule de cordes?

Overall, Moules de corde de Zélande has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Moule de cordes has fewer calories: 57 kcal versus 125 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Moules de corde de Zélande has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons