Moules de corde de Zélande vs Moule de cordes
Overall, Moules de corde de Zélande has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Moules de corde de Zélande | Moule de cordes |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | c |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 125 kcal | 57 kcal |
| Fat | 3.1 g | 0.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 1 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.6 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 1.5 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 17 g | 7.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Moule de cordes has 54% fewer calories (57 kcal vs 125 kcal).
- Moule de cordes has 71% less fat (0.9 g vs 3.1 g).
- Moule de cordes has 70% less saturated fat (0.3 g vs 1 g).
- Moules de corde de Zélande has no sugar, while Moule de cordes has 0.6 g.
- Moules de corde de Zélande has 33% less salt (1 g vs 1.5 g).
- Moules de corde de Zélande has 57% more protein (17 g vs 7.3 g).
- Moules de corde de Zélande has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Moules de corde de Zélande
Not available.
Moule de cordes
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Moules de corde de Zélande or Moule de cordes?
Overall, Moules de corde de Zélande has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Moule de cordes has fewer calories: 57 kcal versus 125 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Moules de corde de Zélande has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.6 g per 100 g.